Navy weight reduction program

However, the sprint speed for the ships would likely not dip under 30 knots, however, he said. Thurraya Kent, a Navy spokeswoman.

Defense Daily subscriber and registered users, please log in here to access the content. Email or Username Password Forgot Password? Not a subscriber or a registered user yet?

Get a Free Trial Here. Please contact clientservices accessintel. ET , to start a free trial, get pricing information, order a reprint, or post an article link on your website. Defense Daily. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Private Policy, and Cookie Policy. Photo: U. How To Join The Navy. Navy Grooming Standards. Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Navy Height and Weight Standards Chart The height standards are the same for both male and female applicants. Women Maximum Weight in lbs.

Author Recent Posts. Nicholas A. Nick Anderson has been serving on Active Duty in the U. Navy for the last 10 years. He graduated from Saint Leo University with his B.

Born and raised in Huntsville, Alabama, Nick enlisted in the Navy at the age of During his deployments onboard the USS Fort McHenry, he traveled to 23 countries on four continents, sailing roughly 42, nautical miles across 30 seas and five oceans.

He currently resides in Meridian, Mississippi. Latest posts by Nicholas A. Includes easy to read tables showing the minimum and maximums. Data analysis included reviewing historical data for trends and developing a budgetary analysis to include Direct Labor Hour rates and opportunity costs. Interviews were conducted with key staff and participants in the WMPs to determine essential aspects and potential beneficial changes to the programs.

Overall results were evaluated to identify potential opportunities for program expansion and improvement.

Furthermore, our cost analysis revealed that the SS program a significantly higher return on investment. Interviews conducted of key staff and participants yielded several commonalities regarding key factors involved with WMPs success or needed improvements.

WMPs navy-wide may benefit from incorporating similar program improvements to increase physical readiness of service members and, therefore, support command mission success.

Congress that at least 9 million young adults between the ages of 17 and 24 yr are too obese to serve in the military. Active duty AD sailors are required to maintain a level of physical fitness to support overall mission readiness. Meeting minimum physical fitness standards is a condition of continued naval service. The Navy advocates a holistic approach to overall wellness via exercise, nutrition, weight control, and wellness education. The Fitness Enhancement Program FEP is a mandatory, traditional, command-wide monitored program designed to improve fitness and nutrition for any member that fails to meet PFA standards.

The ShipShape SS Program is a voluntary Navy weight management program developed based on modern fitness analysis as an alternate WMP to FEP and designed to assist service members with the selection and the implementation of more advantageous life choices.

The eight-session program focuses on preparing participants for this change by utilizing three essential components for weight loss: mindset, nutrition, and physical activity.

Service members who fail PFA standards are required to join one of these two WMP program, however the SS program is additionally available to AD and reservists who are within physical standards. Those personnel considered to be obese Ensuring that these programs provide physical readiness opportunities to and the optimal allocation of resources for service members is paramount for mission success.

We analyzed the cost and effectiveness of the WMPs for the AD population stationed at NMCSD with the intent of offering potential recommendations for program optimization at that command and, potentially, generalized for other programs navy-wide.

As an approved quality improvement program, the cost and effectiveness of the WMP, namely FEP and SS, for the AD population stationed at NMCSD were analyzed with a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis by collecting program data and conducting interviews, respectfully.

To provide perspective, interviews were conducted with key staff and participants in the WMPs programs to determine essential aspects and potential beneficial changes to the programs. Overall results were evaluated to identify potential opportunities for program expansion and improvement as follows:.

Establish recommendations for optimal allocation of resources to support WMPs to maximize AD physical fitness readiness at the command. The personnel interviewed for the SS program included the program manager, fitness trainer, preventive health physician, and clinical social worker.

The full text of the interview questions can be found in Table I. Please describe how your program is resourced, and what activities are offered to participants? How many staff are used in running the program? How many are used to interact with participants? What are their specialties? If money was no issue, what are the three resources you would acquire or increase to help improve your program? Participant interviews were planned with three successful and three unsuccessful participants, for both WMPs.

Interviewees were selected by their respective WMP staff. The full text of the interview questions can be found in Table II. Participants — successful How did you enroll in the weight management program WMP? Is this your first WMP? If not, in what other programs have you participated? Participants - unsuccessful How did you enroll in the weight management program WMP? In , the 14 sailors separated cost over 1 million dollars. Success was defined as a sailor passing the next regularly scheduled PFA, following a failure.

Similar data over multiple cycles for participants in SS were unavailable for a comparison of the long-term success rates. These data covered nine complete classes, which included follow-up data collected 6 mo after completion of the SS course.

Data were also available for classes conducted in late that did not yet have a 6-mo follow-up. From the resources available, sailors were enrolled in SS over the — timeframe, but only of those participants had a complete data set for that period Table III.

This equates to the participant passing their next regular PFA. Only participants who had complete follow-up data were included in this ratio. Navy-wide statistics for the SS program were only available for participants at the time of this study; Table IV depicts a summary of navy-wide SS data. Program costs for FEP and SS were built from a zero-based budget using personnel hours exclusive to each program.

Sunk costs such as facilities, or overhead costs that serve both programs, were not included as they are assumed to be similar for both programs and excluded during a comparison study. Program costs per participant are based on the average number of participants in each program over the last two consecutive years, specifically and For the purposes of this cost analysis, an average FEP participants, which included 25 sailors participating in SS and an average of 33 SS participants, was utilized.

Opportunity costs were calculated by multiplying the time spent by a sailor participating in program activities including travel and hygiene , the average salary E-4 , and the average total number of participants per cycle.

The time spent in these programs is time not spent at their primary job. Because the SS program is only 8 wk long and did not satisfy all the requirements, hours for these participants crossed both programs. As a result, FEP hours were calculated in two tiers.

The first for sailors who participated in just the FEP and second for sailors who participated in both programs. SS opportunity costs only included the time a sailor spent enrolled in the program attending SS led classes. For sailors enrolled in FEP alone, time included 1 h 3 times a week for activities plus 0. SS time included 3 h once a week for activities plus 0. The following assumptions were made during calculations: Used E-4 hourly rate to calculate opportunity cost. FEP opportunity cost does not include time participant spent in 8 wk SS program.

Added 0. This completion rate was calculated using data provided by the program. Summary costs for ShipShape per 8 wk session.